In the reviews of books regarding RA, survivors who post reviews are attacked and threatened. I was. I stated in a post that I was doing research on the topic and shared what I found. A commenter said, "You shouldn't be researching this topic. It could be dangerous." I wrote out a reply and came back in to post it, but the comment had been deleted. Had I reported him for harassment I suspect it wouldn't have been the first time. I found that this happens quite often. They don't want to lose their account too quickly for harassment. So they post, then delete. I have been told to my face that there would be people paid to harass and discredit me if I publish my book. They say this topic is controversial. I say it does a great job of separating the wheat from the chaff. Those first learning about RA would initially not believe me if I were to say, "While you were living in blissful oblivion survivors have been struggling to find support, and then when they do these support groups are intentionally sought out by sociopaths paid to harass and discredit them. Pick your side, and jump in. There has been a war going on while you were sleeping." It's not that these sociopaths are not well researched themselves on the topic. If you are able to offer them supporting evidence they clearly already know of it. They know of it so well in fact that their next strategy will be to attack that case with flawed logic. This happens in all the social media (Facebook, Twitter...).
I have also experienced those spending 16 hours a day to harass survivors changing their sock puppet to mine (pretending to be me) so that it would appear that I was as ignorant as they are. This should be considered when online exposures are made: Definition of sociopath = One who follows RA survivor groups around and "likes" to get points for :('s. To make an exposure you will need to be quick. Get a screen shot before they delete it.
The Satanist Count Grishnackh acknowledges that the army of God is more powerful. He says. "I hide in the shadows and shoot poisonous darts in his back." Evil hates to be exposed.
When asked how he felt about fundamentalist Christians Grishnackh said, "That's the only Christianity I respect."
(Baddeley, G. (1999, 2006, 2010). Lucifer Rising: sin, devil worship & rock 'n' roll, London: Plexus Books, p.207.)
I have also experienced those spending 16 hours a day to harass survivors changing their sock puppet to mine (pretending to be me) so that it would appear that I was as ignorant as they are. This should be considered when online exposures are made: Definition of sociopath = One who follows RA survivor groups around and "likes" to get points for :('s. To make an exposure you will need to be quick. Get a screen shot before they delete it.
The Satanist Count Grishnackh acknowledges that the army of God is more powerful. He says. "I hide in the shadows and shoot poisonous darts in his back." Evil hates to be exposed.
When asked how he felt about fundamentalist Christians Grishnackh said, "That's the only Christianity I respect."
(Baddeley, G. (1999, 2006, 2010). Lucifer Rising: sin, devil worship & rock 'n' roll, London: Plexus Books, p.207.)
RSS Feed
